Whoopi Goldberg recently made headlines by suggesting that WNBA star Brittney Griner consider moving abroad due to what she perceives as a lack of respect for her in the United States.
The actress and television personality voiced her opinion during a discussion on The View, arguing that Griner’s treatment both before and after her detention in Russia highlights deeper societal issues in America.
Goldberg pointed out that despite Griner’s contributions to women’s basketball and her status as an elite athlete, she has not received the level of recognition and respect she deserves.
She compared the public’s reaction to Griner’s return from Russian imprisonment to how male athletes are treated in similar situations. According to Goldberg, the response was far from the hero’s welcome that other prominent sports figures might have received.
The controversy surrounding Griner’s detainment in Russia further fueled Goldberg’s concerns. The WNBA star was arrested in 2022 for possessing cannabis oil, an offense that led to nearly ten months of imprisonment before the U.S. government negotiated her release through a high-profile prisoner exchange.
While some celebrated her return, others criticized the deal, arguing that the U.S. gave up too much in the swap. Goldberg believes that the divided public reaction reflects a broader issue of respect and recognition for female athletes, particularly women of color and members of the LGBTQ+ community.
Goldberg’s remarks sparked debate among fans, analysts, and media personalities. Some agreed with her assertion that Griner has faced undue scrutiny and disrespect, while others argued that her case was primarily a matter of legal circumstances rather than societal bias.
Nevertheless, Goldberg maintained that the backlash Griner has received since her return indicates a deeper cultural divide regarding who is celebrated and who is not.
The question of whether Griner should move abroad is complex, particularly given her history of playing overseas. Before her arrest, Griner had played for UMMC Ekaterinburg in Russia during the WNBA offseason, a common practice among female basketball players seeking higher salaries.
Goldberg suggested that Griner explore options in countries where she might feel more valued and appreciated for her talent and contributions to the sport.
Despite Goldberg’s argument, Griner has expressed a commitment to staying in the U.S. and continuing her career in the WNBA. After her release, she rejoined the Phoenix Mercury and resumed playing at a high level, determined to move past her ordeal.
She has also used her platform to advocate for the release of other Americans wrongfully detained abroad, particularly those without the same level of public attention.
Goldberg’s comments reflect a broader conversation about the treatment of female athletes in the U.S. Many have long argued that women’s sports receive less attention, funding, and respect compared to their male counterparts.
Griner’s situation, in Goldberg’s view, is just another example of the disparities that continue to exist within professional sports and American society as a whole.
Critics of Goldberg’s statement argue that Griner’s struggles are not necessarily a reason for her to leave the country. They contend that staying and continuing to push for equality in sports could be a more impactful way for her to address the systemic issues she faces.
Others believe that while the U.S. has its flaws, it still offers more opportunities and freedoms compared to many other countries, making it an imperfect but preferable place for an athlete like Griner.
The discourse surrounding Griner’s experience also ties into broader discussions about race, gender, and sexuality in American sports.
As a Black, openly gay woman, Griner has faced unique challenges that many male athletes have not. Goldberg’s call for her to consider moving abroad is not just about basketball but about how different identities are valued and respected in the U.S.
While Griner has not directly responded to Goldberg’s suggestion, she has made it clear that she intends to focus on her career and advocacy efforts in the U.S.
She remains an influential figure in women’s basketball and continues to use her platform to highlight issues of inequality and justice. Whether she ultimately decides to explore opportunities abroad or stay and fight for change at home, her story remains a powerful symbol of resilience and perseverance.